
(Converted from Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation, approximate slide layout retained)
![]()
|
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
2009 National Conference on Transportation Operations for Planned and Unplanned Events
Session 15
The Road Ahead - Updates on On-going Initiatives
AASHTO Perspective
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Mark S. Bush, P.E., PTOE March 26, 2009
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Planned or Unplanned???
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
What is AASHTO
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Nonprofit association founded in 1914
Members include:
■ Highway and transportation departments of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico
■ Associate Members from Federal, State, and Local agencies and other countries
Covers all five transportation modes: air, highways, rail, transit, and water
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Vision and Mission
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Vision
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials is the voice for transportation and catalyst for organizational and technical excellence.
Mission
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials advocates transportation-related policies and provides technical services to support states in their efforts to efficiently and safely move people and goods.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
AASHTO's Standing Committees
By Mode:
■ Aviation
■ Highways
■ Public Transportation
■ Railroads
■ Water Transportation
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
SCOTS(EM); SSOM within SCOH
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
SCOH-SubCmte System Op & Mgt
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Technology Task Force
Performance Measures Task Force
Reliability Task Force
Mainstreaming Task Force
SCOTS(EM) Special Cmte on
Transportation Security and Emergency Management
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
AASHTO Operations Focus Areas
Inclusion in national policy positions
Supporting current SAFETEA-LU programs; however, recommendations for new authorization bill
Research (SHRP II, NCHRP, FHWA) and implementation
Peer exchange with partner organizations
Systems Operations and Management Subcommittee and exchange with other Standing and Subcommittees.
Special Committee on Transportation Security and Emergency Management
An AASHTO Operations guidebook to be developed
Expanded Operations
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
The State DOTs
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Design, Build, Maintain, and Operate 19% of the nation's roads on average
■ (Range: CA - 9%; VA and NC - 90%)
Operate Short Line Rail, General Aviation
Heavily Fund Urban Transit
Limited Operator of Transit, Major Airports, Harbors
Motor Vehicle Administration - 18 States
State Patrol, Truck Safety Regulation - 15 States
Planned Events - Plan, Prepare, Respond, Recover
Unplanned Events - Prevent, Plan, Prepare, Respond, Recover
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Logical Highway Focus Areas at the National Level in the USA
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
The National Highway System4% of the miles; 40% of VMT ; 75% of large truck VMT
The Interstate System (subset of the NHS)1% of the highways ; 24% of the VMT
Road Safety 40,000 deaths per year
Project delivery efficiency
24-7 highway system operation efficiency
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Potential performance Areas for
the State DOTs
Safety (e.g. fatalities)
Preservation (e.g. pavement IRI and NHS bridge deficiencies)
Congestion (e.g. delay and system connectivity)
Operations (e.g. incident management )
Freight /Economic Development (e.g. Interstate Highway average speed)
Environment (e.g. greenhouse gas emissions )
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Authorization of a New Federal Transportation Bill
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
SAFETEA-LU expires September 30, 2009
10 Legislative Policy Teams, 12 Proposals
AASHTO Board of Directors October 2008
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
■ Highways
■ Transit
■ Rail
■ Freight
■ Mobility
■ Future
|
|
■ Project Delivery
■ Safety
■ Climate Change
■ Research
■ Revenue
■ Reform
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Proposal Operations Program $3 Billion per year
Real Time System Management
Traveler Information
Emergency Response
Traffic Signal Systems
Smart Work Zone Management
Incident Response
Travel Demand Management
Courtesy Motorist Patrols
ITS System Upgrades and Deployment
etc.
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Proposal ITS RD&T
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Increase to $150 m per year
Continue : 511, IntelliDrive (VII)the Fed/State auto industry partnership effort; other key safety and mobility efforts
Expand: New technology thrust to reduce congestion and greenhouse gas emissions ; and, enhance freight delivery
Fund a Center of Excellence for Operations at AASHTO: to support state and local transport operators
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - $787 Billion
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
ARRA Highlights
Signed into law on February 17, 2009
Provides $48.1 billion for transportation, including:
■ $27.5 billion for highways
■ $8.4 billion for transit
■ $8.0 billion for high speed rail
■ $1.3 billion for Amtrak
■ $1.5 billion for National Surface Transportation Discretionary Grants
Significant accountability, transparency and reporting requirements
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Project Eligibility
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Federal share up to 100%; no match requirement
■ Generally follow the rules of the
Surface Transportation Program (STP) including:
❖ Construction, paving, bridges, transit, pedestrians, bikes, research, training, planning, enhancements,
operations, ITS, traffic signals, systems management
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
State Project Examples
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
State Projects (Continued )
![]() |
|
||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Various Local Agency Projects
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Oakland Co, projects identified, currently using CMAQ funds, given their portion of the stimulus, no projects programmed.
Montogomery Co, MD, ITS projects identified, but all projects programmed to date under the stimulus are hwy projects.
MPO in FL, projects ranked, but no known projects programmed.
Monterey Co, CA, projects programmed but none ranked involving ITS.
City of LA, CA, ITS projects identified
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
Member Organizations
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Transportation (AASHTO, ATA/ATRI, ATSSA, FHWA, ITE, ITSA, I-95 CC, TRB, AMPO)
■ Fire & Rescue (Emergency Responder Safety Institute, IAFC, IAFF, IFSTA, NFPA, NVFC, USFA)
■ Emergency Medical Services (NASEMSO)
■ Public Safety Communications (APCO, NENA)
■ Towing & Recovery (TRAA, AAA)
■ Law Enforcement (IACP)
NTIMC - A National Voice
for TIM
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||||
|
|
National Unified Goal (NUG) For Traffic Incident Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
A consensus document on issues of broad common concern, such as . . .
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Responder Safety
Safe Quick Clearance
Reliable Incident Communications
Accountable Progress
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
AASHTO supports & endorses
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
AASHTO NTIMC NCUTCD
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
AASHTO coordinated a meeting with partners establishing formal 3C and representation.
One member representative of NTIMC and NCUTCD to represent each other.
MUTCD
MUTCD Part 6 I Incident Management
Proposed enhanced diagrams and updates to guidelines, goal of mobility and safety
Federal NPRM
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
Transportation Infrastructure Security and Emergency Management Workshops
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
|
|||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Background
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Combined effort of FHWA and TSA (funding) and
AASHTO (logistics) began in 2006
Status:
5 workshops completed
October 2006: Mississippi Valley Region, Springfield, IL, IDOT hosted
December 2006: Northeast Region, Newark, NJ, NJDOT hosted
June 2007: Western Region, San Francisco, CA, CALTRANS hosted
August 2008: Southeast Region, Tampa, FL, hosted by FDOT
March 2009: Kansas City, KS, hosted by MO/KS DOTs
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Background (cont'd.)
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Original Intent: Conduct 5 regional workshops; publish a best practices document
Attendees: Security and emergency management representatives from state DOT and other state agencies
Format: Let the states do the talking; listen and learn
Modified :
Conduct 4 regional workshops; Conduct one national level workshop to validate/refine/delete/add to findings Publish an issues and effective practices document and identification of additional need^
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
NCHRP and pertinent studies
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
NCHRP 03-84 [Completed]
Guide for Multistate Transportation Operations Programs
NCHRP 20-59(11) [Completed]
Emergency Traffic Operations Management
NCHRP 03-94 [Active]
Transportation Systems Operations and Management Guide
NCHRP 20-77 [Active]
Transportation Operations Training Framework
NCHRP 20-59(23) [Active]
A Guide to Emergency Response Planning at State Transportation Agencies
NCHRP 20-59(24) [Active]
A Guide to Transportation and Hazards Resources
NCHRP 03-86 [Anticipated]
Traffic Operations Management and Planning Process
Additional research also in SHRPII focus areas
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
SHRP II
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Safety: Significantly improve highway safety by achieving an understanding of driving behavior through a study of unprecedented scale.
Renewal: Develop design and construction methods that cause minimal disruption and produce long-lasting facilities to renew the aging highway infrastructure.
Reliability: Reduce congestion and improve travel time reliability through incident management, response, and mitigation.
Capacity: Integrate mobility, economic, environmental, and community needs into the planning and design of new transportation capacity.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Pertinent SHRP II Reliability
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
L06
Institutional Architectures to Advance Operational Strategies
L01
Integrating Business Processes to Improve Reliability
L12
Training and Certification of Traffic Incident Responders
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Additional Information
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
SCOTSEM, Irvine CA, August 24-27, 2009
w NCRHP20-59,
ABE40, and SCOWCoT
SSOM, Manchester NH, June 15-17, 2009
w SCOTE
NCUTCD immediately follows June 18-20, 2009
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Many 3 Legged Stools
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Planning; Engineering; Operations
Change; Challenge; Opportunity
Engineering; Education; Enforcement
Mobility; Safety; Security
Communication; Cooperation; Coordination
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||