
(Converted from Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation, approximate slide layout retained)
![]()
|
|
|||||
|
|
Hurricane Ike Traffic Signal Preparation & Recovery
Presented by:
Jeffrey S. Weatherford, P.E., PTOE
Sr. Assistant Director/City Traffic Operations Engineer
Traffic and Transportation Division
Department of Public Works and Engineering
City of Houston, TX
![]() |
|
|||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
|
|||||
![]()
|
|
|||||
|
Hurricane IKE
|
![]() |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
■ Not the Typical Category 2 Hurricane
- Category 2 Winds
- Category 4 Storm Surge
- Very Large Storm
- NOAA & NWS Are Looking at How Storms Are Categorized as a Result of Ike.
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Hurricane IKE
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Hurricane IKE
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Buffalo Bayou in Houston
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
![]()
|
|
||
|
Hurricane IKE
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Hurricane IKE
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Downtown Houston
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Hurricane IKE
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Hurricane IKE
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
City of Houston Traffic Signal Background
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ The City currently operates and maintains 2,426 traffic signals within the City Limits.
- This includes several hundred TxDOT signalized intersections
- This also includes pedestrian and fire station signals.
- This does not include flashers such as those used for school zones and advance warnings.
■ Each signalized intersection has between 12 - 20 traffic and pedestrian signal heads, depending on intersection size.
■ This yields a total number of approximately 40,000 individual traffic signal heads throughout the City.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Preparation for Ike
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Began Planning Meetings on Wednesday, September 10.
- Scheduling of Staff Resources
■ Planning for Staffing Levels During the Storm
■ Reporting Responsibilities After the Storm
- Facilities Checks
■ Food, Water, Generator Operation & Fuel, Cots
- Began Planning for After Storm Priorities
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Preparation for Ike (Continued)
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ On September 11, Continued Planning Process
■ Focused on After Storm Responsibilities
- Primary Responsibility Immediately After the Storm
■ Clearing Debris
- Traffic Signal Related Debris
■ Hanging Signal Heads, Cables Down, Mast Arms Down
- Other Storm Related Debris As Necessary
■ Trees, roofing, building parts, etc.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Preparation for Ike (Continued)
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Contact lists for contractors and material suppliers were updated.
■ On Thursday, we began releasing staff so they could make personal preparations.
■ Traffic Engineering staff was briefed on assessment activities to be carried out after the storm.
- Immediately after the storm, signal timing techs assisted maintenance techs in recovery.
- Signal engineers were assigned the task of assessing damage.
- Other engineering staff was assigned the task of assessing damage to traffic control signs.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Preparation for Ike (Continued)
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ On Friday, September 12
- Incident Command System Implemented
- Made final equipment checks
■ Fueled vehicles
■ Finished restocking materials on trucks
■ Pre-positioned equipment in outlying areas.
- Final coordination meetings held.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Restoration Strategy
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Three Major Tasks
■ Assessments
- Necessary to determine what materials were needed and to document damage
■ Emergency Repairs
- Work necessary to get signals functioning (green, yellow, red)
■ Restoration
- Makes repairs to return the signals to pre-storm condition
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Emergency Repair Strategy
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Developed a Tier System for Response
- First Tier
■ Highest Volume Thoroughfares
- Westheimer, Bellaire, Shepherd, etc.
■ Downtown
■ Texas Medical Center
■ Reliant Stadium Area
■ Freeway Frontage/Feeder Roads
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Emergency Repair Strategy
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
■ Developed a Tier System for Response
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
- Second Tier
■ Major Thoroughfares
- Third Tier
■ Minor Thoroughfares
- Fourth Tier
■ Other locations on Flash
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Hurricane Ike Damage
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ In Houston, Hurricane Ike was primarily a wind event.
- Traffic signals are extremely vulnerable to wind.
- With limited flooding, the majority of the traffic control cabinets survived the storm.
- Estimated that more than 2000 traffic signals had some damage and more than 2200 without power or flashing immediately after the storm._
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
|||||
|
|
Hurricane Ike Damage
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
![]() |
||||
|
|
|||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
After Hurricane Ike
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Saturday morning, after the winds dropped below Tropical Storm force, we began deploying crews to begin debris removal and assessment.
■ Remaining field staff began reporting at 12:00 noon on Saturday.
■ Engineering staff began damage assessments.
■ Daily planning meetings held to set assignments for the upcoming shifts.
- As contractors came on board, we set up "hunting patches" with defined boundaries where each group would work each day.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Staffing
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ City of Houston Crews
- 53 Electricians and Hardware Analysts
- 27 Equipment Workers
■ Working as Electrician's Helpers
■ Most Normally Assigned to Signing and Pavement Markings
■ 40-2 Person Crews
■ 2 Crews from San Antonio
■ 2 Crews from Dallas
■ Harris County & Metropolitan Transit Authority staff and contractors also assisted City forces.
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
![]() |
|||||
|
|
Staffing
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ City crews worked 12 hour shifts (60 hr weeks) for three weeks after the storm.
■ City crews were on duty 24 hours, 7 days a week.
- Lighter shifts on weekends
■ These crews averaged repairs on 50 to 100+ traffic signals per day.
■ Hired inspectors from Construction Management firms.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Contractors
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ 9 Traffic Signal Contractors Hired
- American Lighting & Signal - 20 Crews
- Republic Electric - 20 Crews
- B & B Electric - 8 Crews
- Pfeiffer Electric - 3 Crews
- Reliable Electric - 3 Crews
- TrafTex - 3 Crews
- Statewide Electric - 3 Crews
- TSC -3 Crews
- TCD - 3 Crews
■ Total of 66 Contractor Crews working under direction of City or Contract Inspectors
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Contractors
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Contractor forces performed complete restorations.
■ They were assigned more heavily damaged areas.
■ The projects they worked on required multiple crews and take longer to complete
- They were able to complete 50+ intersections per day.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Materials
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Due to immediate need, staff examined
salvaged equipment to reclaim useable materials such as:
- Signal mounting hardware,
- LEDs
- Signal sections to build signals.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Materials
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ The City placed orders for materials from various manufacturers on Monday, September 15:
- Signal Heads
- LEDs
- Signal mounting hardware
- Load Switches
- Flashers
- CPU Cards
- Conflict Monitors
■ Beginning on Friday, September 19, daily shipments began arriving.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
No Battle Plan Survives Contact With the Enemy
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Issues impacting the Emergency Repair Strategy
- Houston Police Department requests
- Metropolitan Transit Authority requests along bus routes
- Centerpoint requests
- Power coming back on forced the return to intersections
- Additional problems caused signals that had been operating properly to go into flash.
■ The most common issue was shorted cable.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Additional Challenges
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ Materials
- Our capacity to implement repairs quickly outstripped our ability to provide materials.
■ Changing priorities.
■ Perception that all traffic signal timing data was lost and had to be redone.
■ Public perception that progress was slow.
- Became an issue in election campaigns.
- It became necessary to provide daily updates on progress to the public.
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
![]()
|
|
||||
|
|
Signal Operations Web Site
|
|
||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]()
|
|
||||||
|
|
Summary
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
■ All signals operating normally by October 5th.
■ Costs
- Overtime costs incurred - $353K
- EPOs issued for materials - $2.03M
- EPOs issued for contractor services - $6.77M
- Estimated total costs to date - $9.15M
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||