
(Converted from Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation, approximate slide layout retained)
![]()
|
|
|||
![]() |
Simulation of Emergency Evacuations using TRANSIMS
|
||
|
Dr.-Ing. Hubert Ley
Transportation Research and Analysis Computing Center Argonne National Laboratory
March 26, 2009
|
|||
|
|
|||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
|
TRACC HPC Configuration Diagram
The TRACC computational cluster is a customized LS-1 system from Linux Networx consisting of 512 core 128 compute nodes, each with two dual-core AMD 2216 Opteron CPUs and 4GB of RAM, a DataDirect Networks storage system consisting of 240TB of shared RAID storage, expandable to 750TB, a high-bandwidth, low-latency InfiniBand network for computations, and a high-bandwidth Gigabit Ethernet management network. The system will also include the highest-performance compiler and MPI library available for the AMD Opteron architecture. with a peak performance of ~2 TFlops
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
|||
|
Emergency Evacuations of the Chicago Business District
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
■ This project has been implemented to model the effects of a no-notice event on the multi-modal regional transportation system in the Chicago metropolitan area
■ The chosen scenario postulates a radioactive release following an explosion at the base of the Sears Tower
■ This project deals with the dynamic effect on the transportation system
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
![]()
|
|
||
|
Fundamental Capabilities of the TRANSIMS Approach
■ Multi-modal transportation (vehicles, buses, trains, walking, bicycles,...)
■ Extremely large simulation areas, e.g. Chicago (10,000 square miles)
■ Fully time-aware routing of each individual traveler for all travel modes
■ Microsimulation for large metropolitan areas to determine the interactions between travelers and vehicles to determine second by second movements
- Determination of vehicle interactions, such as lane changes, speed changes, passenger loading and unloading, .
- Interaction with the road network, e.g. with traffic signals, speed limits, turn lanes, transit vehicles, .
■ This approach overcomes the limitations of traditional traffic forecasting models:
- Delivering transportation system performance as a full function of time instead of static solution for a few time periods (e.g. am and pm peaks)
- Microscopic interaction between vehicles and travelers delivers accurate results compared to simple volume delay functions and aggregate data.
■ Main challenges: Massive demands on computation time and a need for extremely detailed input data
|
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
|
10,000 Square Miles Simulation Area
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
|||
|
Available Data Sources and the Types of Data Needed
|
![]() |
||
|
■ CMAP and TRACC Network Improvements
|
|||
|
■ Main focus is on network topology, in particular:
- Connectivity
- Number of Lanes
- Functional Classes
- Speed Limits
- Coded Length
- Capacities, etc.
|
|||
|
■ For visualization and more precise modeling:
- Exact geographic locations
- Shapes along links
- Correct integration of transit links and stops, etc.
|
|||
|
|
|||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
|||
|
Current
Status
■ Each
individual lane is modeled
■ Pocket
lanes are modeled
■ Lane Connectivity
■ Signals
- Phasing
- Timing
■ Parking
■ Many more details
|
![]() |
||
|
|
|||
![]()
|
|
|||
|
The Regional Road Network
■ ~10,000 square miles
■ Road network
- 40,000 links
- 14,000 intersections
- 250,000 locations
■ ~28 million vehicle trips
■ ~1.5 million transit trips
■ Trip tables
- Break-down by purpose (work, truck, airport, and many more)
|
![]() |
||
|
|
|||
![]()
|
|
|||
![]() |
Some Preliminary Results
■ The metropolitan road network accommodates the trips reasonably well problems)
■ Traffic volumes per lane are shown as an indicator of congestion (e.g. 8:00 to 8:15)
■ The TRACC cluster has reduced computing time for 27 million routes to less than 15 minutes using just 48 processors (of 512)
|
||
|
|
|||
![]()
|
|
||
|
Example Case Study: Evacuation with Transit to a Shelter
|
||
|
|
||
|
■ Scenario:
- The Emergency Response Team secures a few suitable transit stations
- People in the Evacuation Area are directed to walk to these stations
- Transit transportation is provided to take them to a shelter location (e.g. United Center)
|
||
|
|
||
|
■ TRANSIMS is already able to simulate for each individual person:
- Delays in leaving buildings
- Walking towards the closest evacuation stop
- Flow of buses within congested roads and/or on reserved lanes
- And more ...
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
|
Complex Evacuation Strategies
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]()
|
|
||
|
TRACC Contact Information
|
||
|
|
||
|
■ Director's Office
- Dave Weber, Director dpweber@anl.gov
- Mike Boxberger boxberger@anl.gov
■ Systems Administration
- Jon Bernard bernard@anl.gov
■ Traffic Simulation
- Hubert Ley hley@anl.gov
■ Computational Structural Mechanics
- Ronald Kulak kulak@anl.gov
■ Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Tanju Sofu tsofu@anl.gov
|
||
|
|
||